Posts tagged May 2010 elections

Blood-stained politics

 

November 23, 2009, Monday, proved to be a day darker than the year 2012 in the movie.

http://www.newsday.com/news/world/death-toll-at-57-in-philippine-massacre-1.1621662?qr=1

It is inexplicably darker because of the 64 persons massacred in Maguindanao.  The despicable act of human carnage happened as the convoy of Vice Mayor Toto Mangudadatu’s wife and two sisters were heading to the Provincial Capitol to file his certificate of candidacy for governor.  Along with the convoy were supporters and journalists.  Datu Unsay mayor Andal Ampatuan Jr. is the alleged mastermind.  His father Andal Ampatuan Sr. is currently the governor of Maguindanao province and is planning to run again despite term limits.  He has won all three terms unopposed. The Ampatuans are close allies of the Arroyo administration, with their region contributing to her win in the 2006 elections.  Before her death, Mangudadatu’s wife was still able to call him and attested that it was Ampatuan’s men who have blocked their way.

 

Much is to be said about this atrocity. We can question the culture of impunity in our country, the tradition of the“utang na loob” the people’s lack of values and faith in the Almighty; but five days later, we still have no answers. Life in areas apart from the site of the massacre has continued with people seemingly nonchalant about the monsters of people that are living among us and playing God over people’s lives. We have become overly desensitized to terror and crimes that we cannot identify anymore when enough is enough. It’s the hopelessness at the back of everyone’s minds that’s eating our souls and spoiling our feelings. The perpetrators  of the crime are despicable, but how about us? Do we care enough to effect change? Do we care enough to seek individually a way to make this country better? Is it not despicable that we care when the news comes out and then forget about it the next day?

 

After we identify with the problem, we look not for solutions but for the easy way out. We see ways to get out of the problem but not ways to address its very root to ensure that it doesn’t happen again.  This massacre should open our eyes to the vicious cycle of passivity and irresponsibility especially with regard to the votes we cast during elections. We have all become part of the cycle and this has lead to the mass murder of those who were courageous enough to go against the tide. We are all in danger, directly or indirectly. We are in danger of handing over this country to the blood-stained hands of criminals; thereby becoming accessories to the crime we detest.

http://www.newsday.com/news/world/death-toll-at-57-in-philippine-massacre-1.1621662?qr=1


The only way to rise above the danger is to be strong enough to take responsibility for our actions.  The elections is not the end all and be all of good citizenship.  The fate of our country lies in our diligence to safeguard the welfare of its people from corrupt practices and a dysfunctional system.  It starts from us refusing to tolerate the malpractices we see are happening in our daily interactions with institutions like the government.  It starts with us building our awareness about societal issues and actually wanting to do something about it.  We are to work on believing that we still can make a difference, that we will not be swallowed by a corrupt system and that ultimately by changing for the better, we can turn things around.

Comments (4) »

A world title, a third party, a propaganda?

The world may have stopped, but the people have certainly NOT stopped talking.

All activity might have stopped from the busy streets to small households all over the Philippines during the Manny Pacquiao-Miguel Cotto title match, but indeed people haven’t stopped talking.  Prior to his fight against Cotto, Pacquiao was reported to have flown sexy actress Krista Ranillo and her family to Las Vegas, all-expense paid, to witness him fight live at the MGM Grand.  News then came out that Pacquiao’s wife Jinkee stayed in a different hotel and was seen twice on television in tears.  Thus came the birth of Team Jinkee on Facebook and Krista Ranillo being labeled the “Pakbet” or “Pacman’s Kabet”.  Although information about this love triangle started even before Pacquiao’s fight, it wouldn’t seem to let on even after the Champ won his 7th straight world title, making the match a significant event in boxing history and strengthening his stature as the world’s greatest boxer.

Pacquiao-Cotto Weigh-In (November 12, 2009 - Photo by Ethan Miller/Getty Images North America)

KEATS LONDON/PDI http://www.inquirer.net/specialfeatures/ThePacquiaoFiles/

However, publicity brought by the infidelity issue is most likely not what Pacquiao’s political strategists had in mind.  But publicity, bad as it is, could be repackaged to suit the party’s interests with the right reinforcement.  And reinforcement comes when Jinkee Pacquiao becomes more vocal than her husband in interviews saying that she and her husband are working things out by talking things over.  This is such an overrated line that has been used way before Sharon and Gabby, Pops and Martin and even Kristin and Diether.  Funny because at the same time, Jinkee pleads to the public to respect her family’s privacy and her children’s welfare then suddenly the Manny-Jinkee love story is featured in a Sunday showbiz news show.

All the media coverage he’s given leads me to think this is another election propaganda conveniently reinforced by the surge of Filipino pride.  Pacquiao has been vocal about his bid for Sarangani congressman in the 2010 elections.  His closeness with known politicians and businessmen like Chavit Singson and Lito Atienza is not without a tinge of political agenda.

This issue gives the message that Manny is still “human” like any of us, more importantly his constituents despite being on the pedestal his achievements have placed him in.  It balanced the good and the bad about him and emphasized his “family man” persona, the devoted husband and doting father.

Once again, politics is show business.  We are looking at a very sly example of the classic appeal to emotions approach by a would-be politician.  Though it’s obviously the norm, do we actually want to make it the standard?

Comments (8) »

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.